Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/5] BTRFS hot relocation support

2013-05-28 Thread Duncan
Kent Overstreet posted on Tue, 28 May 2013 17:38:15 -0700 as excerpted: > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 02:22:34AM +, Duncan wrote: >> zwu.kernel posted on Mon, 20 May 2013 23:11:22 +0800 as excerpted: >> >> > The patchset is trying to introduce hot relocation support for BTRFS. >> >> One advantag

Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/5] BTRFS hot relocation support

2013-05-28 Thread Kent Overstreet
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 02:22:34AM +, Duncan wrote: > zwu.kernel posted on Mon, 20 May 2013 23:11:22 +0800 as excerpted: > > > The patchset is trying to introduce hot relocation support > > for BTRFS. In hybrid storage environment, when the data in rotating disk > > get hot, it can be relocate

Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/5] BTRFS hot relocation support

2013-05-20 Thread Duncan
zwu.kernel posted on Mon, 20 May 2013 23:11:22 +0800 as excerpted: > The patchset is trying to introduce hot relocation support > for BTRFS. In hybrid storage environment, when the data in rotating disk > get hot, it can be relocated to nonrotating disk by BTRFS hot relocation > support automatica

[RFC PATCH v1 0/5] BTRFS hot relocation support

2013-05-20 Thread zwu . kernel
From: Zhi Yong Wu The patchset as RFC is sent out mainly to see if its design goes in the correct development direction. When working on this feature, i am trying to change as less the existing btrfs code as possible. After V0 was sent out, i carefully checked the patchset for speed profile,