On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 08:22:40AM -0800, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
> On 12/19/14, 1:55 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:35:27AM CET, marichi...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>On 19 December 2014 at 14:53, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >>>Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:01:46AM CET, marichi...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>
On 12/19/14, 1:55 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:35:27AM CET, marichi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 December 2014 at 14:53, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:01:46AM CET, marichi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 December 2014 at 13:57, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 06:1
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 03:05:27PM +0530, B Viswanath wrote:
> On 19 December 2014 at 14:53, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> > Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:01:46AM CET, marichi...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>On 19 December 2014 at 13:57, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >>> Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 06:14:57AM CET, marichi...@gmail.com w
On 19 December 2014 at 15:25, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:35:27AM CET, marichi...@gmail.com wrote:
>>On 19 December 2014 at 14:53, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:01:46AM CET, marichi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 December 2014 at 13:57, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Fri,
Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:35:27AM CET, marichi...@gmail.com wrote:
>On 19 December 2014 at 14:53, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:01:46AM CET, marichi...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>On 19 December 2014 at 13:57, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 06:14:57AM CET, marichi...@gmail.com w
Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:22:24AM CET, marichi...@gmail.com wrote:
>On 19 December 2014 at 14:31, B Viswanath wrote:
>> On 19 December 2014 at 13:57, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 06:14:57AM CET, marichi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 December 2014 at 05:18, Roopa Prabhu
wrote:
>>
On 19 December 2014 at 14:53, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:01:46AM CET, marichi...@gmail.com wrote:
>>On 19 December 2014 at 13:57, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 06:14:57AM CET, marichi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 December 2014 at 05:18, Roopa Prabhu
wrote:
>>>
Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:01:46AM CET, marichi...@gmail.com wrote:
>On 19 December 2014 at 13:57, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 06:14:57AM CET, marichi...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>On 19 December 2014 at 05:18, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
On 12/18/14, 3:26 PM, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
>
>
>
On 19 December 2014 at 14:31, B Viswanath wrote:
> On 19 December 2014 at 13:57, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 06:14:57AM CET, marichi...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>On 19 December 2014 at 05:18, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
On 12/18/14, 3:26 PM, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
>
>
>
> We
On 19 December 2014 at 13:57, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 06:14:57AM CET, marichi...@gmail.com wrote:
>>On 19 December 2014 at 05:18, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
>>> On 12/18/14, 3:26 PM, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
We also need an interface to set per-switch attributes. Can th
Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 06:14:57AM CET, marichi...@gmail.com wrote:
>On 19 December 2014 at 05:18, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
>> On 12/18/14, 3:26 PM, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/18/2014 3:07 PM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
On 12/18/14, 11:21 AM, John Fastabend wrote:
>
> On 12/18/
Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:48:28AM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>On 12/18/14, 3:26 PM, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
>>
>>On 12/18/2014 3:07 PM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
>>>On 12/18/14, 11:21 AM, John Fastabend wrote:
On 12/18/2014 10:14 AM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
>On 12/18/14, 10:02 AM, Varlese,
opa Prabhu; Varlese, Marco
>>Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; Thomas Graf; Jiri Pirko; sfel...@gmail.com; linux-
>>ker...@vger.kernel.org
>>Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v2 1/1] net: Support for switch port
>>configuration
>>
>>On 12/18/2014 10:14 AM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
&
On 19 December 2014 at 05:18, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
> On 12/18/14, 3:26 PM, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/18/2014 3:07 PM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12/18/14, 11:21 AM, John Fastabend wrote:
On 12/18/2014 10:14 AM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
>
> On 12/18/14, 10:02 AM, Varl
On 12/18/14 at 06:02pm, Varlese, Marco wrote:
> Roopa, one of the comments I got from Thomas Graf on my v1 patch was that
> your patch and mine were supplementary ("I think Roopa's patches are
> supplementary. Not all switchdev users will be backed with a Linux Bridge. I
> therefore welcome your
On 12/18/14, 3:26 PM, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
On 12/18/2014 3:07 PM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
On 12/18/14, 11:21 AM, John Fastabend wrote:
On 12/18/2014 10:14 AM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
On 12/18/14, 10:02 AM, Varlese, Marco wrote:
Removed unnecessary content for ease of reading...
+/* Switch Por
On 12/18/2014 3:07 PM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
On 12/18/14, 11:21 AM, John Fastabend wrote:
On 12/18/2014 10:14 AM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
On 12/18/14, 10:02 AM, Varlese, Marco wrote:
Removed unnecessary content for ease of reading...
+/* Switch Port Attributes section */
+
+enum {
+IFLA_ATTR_
On 12/18/14, 11:21 AM, John Fastabend wrote:
On 12/18/2014 10:14 AM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
On 12/18/14, 10:02 AM, Varlese, Marco wrote:
Removed unnecessary content for ease of reading...
+/* Switch Port Attributes section */
+
+enum {
+IFLA_ATTR_UNSPEC,
+IFLA_ATTR_LEARNING,
Any reason
l.com; linux-
>ker...@vger.kernel.org
>Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v2 1/1] net: Support for switch port
>configuration
>
>On 12/18/2014 10:14 AM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
>> On 12/18/14, 10:02 AM, Varlese, Marco wrote:
>>> Removed unnecessary content for ease of reading...
On 12/18/2014 10:14 AM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
> On 12/18/14, 10:02 AM, Varlese, Marco wrote:
>> Removed unnecessary content for ease of reading...
>>
+/* Switch Port Attributes section */
+
+enum {
+IFLA_ATTR_UNSPEC,
+IFLA_ATTR_LEARNING,
>>> An
On 12/18/14, 10:02 AM, Varlese, Marco wrote:
Removed unnecessary content for ease of reading...
+/* Switch Port Attributes section */
+
+enum {
+ IFLA_ATTR_UNSPEC,
+ IFLA_ATTR_LEARNING,
Any reason you want learning here ?. This is covered as part of
the bridge setlink attributes.
Removed unnecessary content for ease of reading...
> > +/* Switch Port Attributes section */
> > +
> > +enum {
> > + IFLA_ATTR_UNSPEC,
> > + IFLA_ATTR_LEARNING,
> Any reason you want learning here ?. This is covered as part of
> the bridge setlink attribu
Pirko;
sfel...@gmail.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v2 1/1] net: Support for switch port
configuration
On 12/18/14, 6:55 AM, Varlese, Marco wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Roopa Prabhu [mailto:ro...@cumulusnetworks.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014
l...@gmail.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v2 1/1] net: Support for switch port
> configuration
>
> On 12/18/14, 6:55 AM, Varlese, Marco wrote:
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Roopa Prabhu [mailto:ro...@cumulusnetworks.
Varlese, Marco
> >> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 4:56 PM
> >> To: Roopa Prabhu
> >> Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; Fastabend, John R; Thomas Graf; Jiri
> >> Pirko; sfel...@gmail.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> >> Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH net-next v2 1
c: net...@vger.kernel.org; Fastabend, John R; Thomas Graf; Jiri Pirko;
>> sfel...@gmail.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH net-next v2 1/1] net: Support for switch port
>> configuration
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: R
gt; sfel...@gmail.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH net-next v2 1/1] net: Support for switch port
> configuration
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Roopa Prabhu [mailto:ro...@cumulusnetworks.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 18,
.com; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v2 1/1] net: Support for switch port
> configuration
>
> On 12/18/14 at 11:29am, Varlese, Marco wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> > b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h index f7d0d2d..19cb51a
@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v2 1/1] net: Support for switch port
configuration
On 12/18/14, 3:29 AM, Varlese, Marco wrote:
From: Marco Varlese
Switch hardware offers a list of attributes that are configurable on a
per port basis.
This patch provides a mechanism to configure switch
gt; Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v2 1/1] net: Support for switch port
> configuration
>
> On 12/18/14, 3:29 AM, Varlese, Marco wrote:
> > From: Marco Varlese
> >
> > Switch hardware offers a list of attributes that are configurable on a
> > per port basis.
> &g
On 12/18/14, 3:29 AM, Varlese, Marco wrote:
From: Marco Varlese
Switch hardware offers a list of attributes that are configurable
on a per port basis.
This patch provides a mechanism to configure switch ports by adding
an NDO for setting specific values to specific attributes.
There will be a s
On 12/18/14 at 11:29am, Varlese, Marco wrote:
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> index f7d0d2d..19cb51a 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> @@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ enum {
> IFLA_PHYS_PORT_ID,
> IFLA_CAR
From: Marco Varlese
Switch hardware offers a list of attributes that are configurable
on a per port basis.
This patch provides a mechanism to configure switch ports by adding
an NDO for setting specific values to specific attributes.
There will be a separate patch that adds the "get" functionalit
33 matches
Mail list logo