Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] ACPI/Resource: Add address translation support

2013-09-11 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, September 11, 2013 10:26:37 AM Lan Tianyu wrote: > On 09/08/2013 10:18 PM, Lan Tianyu wrote: > > On 2013年09月07日 08:15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> On Friday, September 06, 2013 10:24:44 AM Lan Tianyu wrote: > >>> According ACPI 5.0 spec Section 19.1.8 > >>> "For bridges, translate a

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] ACPI/Resource: Add address translation support

2013-09-11 Thread Lan Tianyu
On 09/08/2013 10:18 PM, Lan Tianyu wrote: On 2013年09月07日 08:15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Friday, September 06, 2013 10:24:44 AM Lan Tianyu wrote: According ACPI 5.0 spec Section 19.1.8 "For bridges, translate addresses across the bridge, this is the offset that must be added to the address o

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] ACPI/Resource: Add address translation support

2013-09-08 Thread Lan Tianyu
On 2013年09月07日 08:15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, September 06, 2013 10:24:44 AM Lan Tianyu wrote: >> According ACPI 5.0 spec Section 19.1.8 >> "For bridges, translate addresses across the bridge, this is the >> offset that must be added to the address on the secondary side >> to obtain t

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] ACPI/Resource: Add address translation support

2013-09-06 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, September 06, 2013 10:24:44 AM Lan Tianyu wrote: > According ACPI 5.0 spec Section 19.1.8 > "For bridges, translate addresses across the bridge, this is the > offset that must be added to the address on the secondary side > to obtain the address on the primary side. Non-bridge devices >

[RFC PATCH 2/4] ACPI/Resource: Add address translation support

2013-09-06 Thread Lan Tianyu
According ACPI 5.0 spec Section 19.1.8 "For bridges, translate addresses across the bridge, this is the offset that must be added to the address on the secondary side to obtain the address on the primary side. Non-bridge devices must list 0." This patch is to add address translation offset to the