On 11/12/2012 02:49 AM, Preeti Murthy wrote:
> Hi Alex
> I apologise for the delay in replying .
That's all right. I often also busy on other Intel tasks and have no
time to look at LKML. :)
>
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
>> On 11/07/2012 12:37 PM, Preeti Murthy wrote:
>>> H
Hi Alex
I apologise for the delay in replying .
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
> On 11/07/2012 12:37 PM, Preeti Murthy wrote:
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> What I am concerned about in this patchset as Peter also
>> mentioned in the previous discussion of your approach
>> (https://lkml.org/l
On 11/07/2012 12:37 PM, Preeti Murthy wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> What I am concerned about in this patchset as Peter also
> mentioned in the previous discussion of your approach
> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/13/139)
> is that:
>
> 1.Using nr_running of two different sched groups to decide which one
On 11/07/2012 03:51 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 21:09:58 +0800
> Alex Shi wrote:
>
>> $for ((i=0; i < I; i++)) ; do while true; do : ; done & done
>>
>> Checking the power consuming with a powermeter on the NHM EP.
>> powersaving performance
>> I = 2 148w
Hi Alex,
What I am concerned about in this patchset as Peter also
mentioned in the previous discussion of your approach
(https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/13/139)
is that:
1.Using nr_running of two different sched groups to decide which one
can be group_leader or group_min might not be be the right ap
On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 21:09:58 +0800
Alex Shi wrote:
> $for ((i=0; i < I; i++)) ; do while true; do : ; done & done
>
> Checking the power consuming with a powermeter on the NHM EP.
> powersaving performance
> I = 2 148w160w
> I = 4 175w181w
> I = 8 207w
This patch enabled the power aware consideration in load balance.
As mentioned in the power aware scheduler proposal, Power aware
scheduling has 2 assumptions:
1, race to idle is helpful for power saving
2, shrink tasks on less sched_groups will reduce power consumption
The first assumption make
7 matches
Mail list logo