On 2015/6/27 16:30, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
Hi Wang,
On 2015/06/27 16:34, Wangnan (F) wrote:
On 2015/6/27 15:29, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
On 2015/06/25 19:37, Wang Nan wrote:
Before this patch, add_perf_probe_events() init symbol maps only for
uprobe if the first pev passed to it is a uprob
Hi Wang,
On 2015/06/27 16:34, Wangnan (F) wrote:
>
>
> On 2015/6/27 15:29, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> On 2015/06/25 19:37, Wang Nan wrote:
>>> Before this patch, add_perf_probe_events() init symbol maps only for
>>> uprobe if the first pev passed to it is a uprobe event. However, with
>>> the in
On 2015/6/27 15:29, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
On 2015/06/25 19:37, Wang Nan wrote:
Before this patch, add_perf_probe_events() init symbol maps only for
uprobe if the first pev passed to it is a uprobe event. However, with
the incoming BPF uprobe support, now it will be possible to pass an
array
On 2015/06/25 19:37, Wang Nan wrote:
> Before this patch, add_perf_probe_events() init symbol maps only for
> uprobe if the first pev passed to it is a uprobe event. However, with
> the incoming BPF uprobe support, now it will be possible to pass an
> array with combined kprobe and uprobe events to
On 6/25/15 3:37 AM, Wang Nan wrote:
Before this patch, add_perf_probe_events() init symbol maps only for
uprobe if the first pev passed to it is a uprobe event. However, with
the incoming BPF uprobe support, now it will be possible to pass an
array with combined kprobe and uprobe events to add_pe
Before this patch, add_perf_probe_events() init symbol maps only for
uprobe if the first pev passed to it is a uprobe event. However, with
the incoming BPF uprobe support, now it will be possible to pass an
array with combined kprobe and uprobe events to add_perf_probe_events().
This patch check a
6 matches
Mail list logo
