Re: [RFC PATCH 03/11] Annotate core code that should not be traced

2008-01-03 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
* Steven Rostedt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > > > > { > > > struct irq_desc *desc = irq_desc + irq; > > > struct irqaction *action; > > > Index: linux-compile.git/kernel/lockdep.c > > > === > > > --- linux-compile.gi

Re: [RFC PATCH 03/11] Annotate core code that should not be traced

2008-01-03 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > * Steven Rostedt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Mark with "notrace" functions in core code that should not be > > traced. The "notrace" attribute will prevent gcc from adding > > a call to mcount on the annotated funtions. > > > > Signed-off-by: A

Re: [RFC PATCH 03/11] Annotate core code that should not be traced

2008-01-03 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
* Steven Rostedt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Mark with "notrace" functions in core code that should not be > traced. The "notrace" attribute will prevent gcc from adding > a call to mcount on the annotated funtions. > > Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Signed-off-by:

[RFC PATCH 03/11] Annotate core code that should not be traced

2008-01-02 Thread Steven Rostedt
Mark with "notrace" functions in core code that should not be traced. The "notrace" attribute will prevent gcc from adding a call to mcount on the annotated funtions. Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/clocks