Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] Fix year 2038 issue for sound subsystem

2017-09-22 Thread Takashi Iwai
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 11:15:05 +0200, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 01:07:37PM +0900, Takashi Sakamoto wrote: > > > I note that at a development period for v4.5 kernel, ALSA developers > > (mainly Iwai-san) fixed x32 ABI compatibility bugs. Then I prepared for > > a rough set of tes

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] Fix year 2038 issue for sound subsystem

2017-09-22 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 01:07:37PM +0900, Takashi Sakamoto wrote: > I note that at a development period for v4.5 kernel, ALSA developers > (mainly Iwai-san) fixed x32 ABI compatibility bugs. Then I prepared for > a rough set of test for ioctl command[3] to check his work. The set will > partly hel

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] Fix year 2038 issue for sound subsystem

2017-09-21 Thread Baolin Wang
Hi Takashi, On 22 September 2017 at 12:07, Takashi Sakamoto wrote: > Hi, > > > On Sep 21 2017 15:18, Baolin Wang wrote: >> >> Since many structures will use timespec type variables to record time >> stamp >> in uapi/asound.h, which are not year 2038 safe on 32bit system. This >> patchset >> tries

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] Fix year 2038 issue for sound subsystem

2017-09-21 Thread Takashi Sakamoto
Hi, On Sep 21 2017 15:18, Baolin Wang wrote: Since many structures will use timespec type variables to record time stamp in uapi/asound.h, which are not year 2038 safe on 32bit system. This patchset tries to introduce new structures removing timespec type to compatible native mode and compat mod

[RFC PATCH 0/7] Fix year 2038 issue for sound subsystem

2017-09-20 Thread Baolin Wang
Since many structures will use timespec type variables to record time stamp in uapi/asound.h, which are not year 2038 safe on 32bit system. This patchset tries to introduce new structures removing timespec type to compatible native mode and compat mode. Moreover this patchset also converts the int