Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Configurable fair allocation zone policy v4

2013-12-19 Thread Mel Gorman
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 04:06:17PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote: > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 07:41:57PM +, Mel Gorman wrote: > > This is still a work in progress. I know Johannes is maintaining his own > > patch which takes a different approach and has different priorities. Michal > > Hocko has r

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Configurable fair allocation zone policy v4

2013-12-19 Thread Michal Hocko
On Wed 18-12-13 16:06:17, Johannes Weiner wrote: [...] > From: Johannes Weiner > Subject: [patch] mm: page_alloc: revert NUMA aspect of fair allocation > policy > > 81c0a2bb ("mm: page_alloc: fair zone allocator policy") meant to bring > aging fairness among zones in system, but it was overzealo

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Configurable fair allocation zone policy v4

2013-12-18 Thread Johannes Weiner
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 07:41:57PM +, Mel Gorman wrote: > This is still a work in progress. I know Johannes is maintaining his own > patch which takes a different approach and has different priorities. Michal > Hocko has raised concerns potentially affecting both. I'm releasing this so > there

[RFC PATCH 0/6] Configurable fair allocation zone policy v4

2013-12-18 Thread Mel Gorman
This is still a work in progress. I know Johannes is maintaining his own patch which takes a different approach and has different priorities. Michal Hocko has raised concerns potentially affecting both. I'm releasing this so there is a basis of comparison with Johannes' patch. It's not necessarily