Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] restartable sequences benchmarks

2015-10-22 Thread Dave Watson
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:11:42PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Dave Watson wrote: > > > >RSS CPUIDLE LATENCYMS > > jemalloc 4.0.0 31G 33% 390 > > jemalloc + this patch 25G 33% 390

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] restartable sequences benchmarks

2015-10-22 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Dave Watson wrote: > We've been testing out restartable sequences + malloc changes for use > at Facebook. Below are some test results, as well as some possible > changes based on Paul Turner's original patches Thanks! I'll stare at this some time between now an

[RFC PATCH 0/3] restartable sequences benchmarks

2015-10-22 Thread Dave Watson
We've been testing out restartable sequences + malloc changes for use at Facebook. Below are some test results, as well as some possible changes based on Paul Turner's original patches https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/24/665 I ran one service with several permutations of various mallocs. The servic