> Avri Altman writes:
>
> > The mmc driver has some hooks to support rpmb access, but access is
> > mainly facilitated from user space, e.g. mmc-utils.
> >
> > The ufs driver has no concept of rpmb access - it is facilitated via
> > user space, e.g. ufs-utils and similar.
> >
> > Both for ufs and
Avri Altman writes:
> The mmc driver has some hooks to support rpmb access, but access is
> mainly facilitated from user space, e.g. mmc-utils.
>
> The ufs driver has no concept of rpmb access - it is facilitated via
> user space, e.g. ufs-utils and similar.
>
> Both for ufs and mmc, rpmb acces
The mmc driver has some hooks to support rpmb access, but access is
mainly facilitated from user space, e.g. mmc-utils.
The ufs driver has no concept of rpmb access - it is facilitated via
user space, e.g. ufs-utils and similar.
Both for ufs and mmc, rpmb access is defined in their applicable jed
Hi,
This is a follow-up to the email I sent last month:
Subject: RPMB user space ABI
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 14:07:00 +
Message-ID: <87mtwashi4@linaro.org>
which attempts to put some concrete flesh on the bones of the proposal
for a new internal kernel API for dealing with RPMB part
4 matches
Mail list logo
