Hi Jules,
On 12/26/2020 17:45, Jules Maselbas wrote:
> Hi Artur,
>
> On Fri, Dec 25, 2020 at 11:41:04AM +, Artur Petrosyan wrote:
>>> @@ -251,7 +251,12 @@ static int dwc2_lowlevel_hw_init(struct dwc2_hsotg
>>> *hsotg)
>>> }
>>>
>>> if (!hsotg->phy) {
>>> - hsotg->uphy =
Hi Artur,
On Fri, Dec 25, 2020 at 11:41:04AM +, Artur Petrosyan wrote:
> > @@ -251,7 +251,12 @@ static int dwc2_lowlevel_hw_init(struct dwc2_hsotg
> > *hsotg)
> > }
> >
> > if (!hsotg->phy) {
> > - hsotg->uphy = devm_usb_get_phy(hsotg->dev, USB_PHY_TYPE_USB2);
> > +
Hi Jules,
On 12/16/2020 20:59, Jules Maselbas wrote:
> On probe the dwc2 driver tries two path to get an usb phy, first calling
> devm_phy_get() and secondly with devm_usb_get_phy().
>
> However the current implementation of devm_phy_get() never return a valid
> phy for usb-nop-xceiv. And the cur
On probe the dwc2 driver tries two path to get an usb phy, first calling
devm_phy_get() and secondly with devm_usb_get_phy().
However the current implementation of devm_phy_get() never return a valid
phy for usb-nop-xceiv. And the current implementation of devm_usb_get_phy
only check for phy that'
4 matches
Mail list logo