On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 09:22:16 +0800 Xiaotian Feng wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Andrew Morton
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2 Nov 2012 10:48:54 +0800
> > Xiaotian Feng wrote:
> >
> >> We met a ksoftirqd 100% issue, the perf top shows kernel is busy
> >> with tasklet_action(), but no actual ac
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Nov 2012 10:48:54 +0800
> Xiaotian Feng wrote:
>
>> We met a ksoftirqd 100% issue, the perf top shows kernel is busy
>> with tasklet_action(), but no actual action is shown. From dumped
>> kernel, there's only one disabled tasklet
On Fri, 2 Nov 2012 10:48:54 +0800
Xiaotian Feng wrote:
> We met a ksoftirqd 100% issue, the perf top shows kernel is busy
> with tasklet_action(), but no actual action is shown. From dumped
> kernel, there's only one disabled tasklet on the tasklet_vec.
>
> tasklet_action might be handled after
We met a ksoftirqd 100% issue, the perf top shows kernel is busy
with tasklet_action(), but no actual action is shown. From dumped
kernel, there's only one disabled tasklet on the tasklet_vec.
tasklet_action might be handled after tasklet is disabled, this will
make disabled tasklet stayed on task
4 matches
Mail list logo