Hi,
On Friday 14 June 2013 06:04 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
On Wednesday 12 June 2013 08:53 PM, g...@slimlogic.co.uk wrote:
On 2013-06-12 15:51, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 03:31:09PM +0100, g...@slimlogic.co.uk wrote:
On 2013-06-12 15:14, Mark Brown wrote:
Yes, that seems like
On Wednesday 12 June 2013 08:53 PM, g...@slimlogic.co.uk wrote:
On 2013-06-12 15:51, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 03:31:09PM +0100, g...@slimlogic.co.uk wrote:
On 2013-06-12 15:14, Mark Brown wrote:
Yes, that seems like the most obvious thing here as far as I can tell
>from the f
On 2013-06-12 15:51, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 03:31:09PM +0100, g...@slimlogic.co.uk wrote:
On 2013-06-12 15:14, Mark Brown wrote:
>Yes, that seems like the most obvious thing here as far as I can tell
>from the frankly fragmented and obscure information but given all the
>co
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 03:31:09PM +0100, g...@slimlogic.co.uk wrote:
> On 2013-06-12 15:14, Mark Brown wrote:
> >Yes, that seems like the most obvious thing here as far as I can tell
> >from the frankly fragmented and obscure information but given all the
> >confusion that seems to exist among th
On 2013-06-12 15:14, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 02:12:07PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
I think ff we really want to abstract this stuff then we should have
the two different regulator SMPS10-OUT1 and SMPS-OUT2 as there is
physically two pins in the device for output and control
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 02:12:07PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> I think ff we really want to abstract this stuff then we should have
> the two different regulator SMPS10-OUT1 and SMPS-OUT2 as there is
> physically two pins in the device for output and controlled
> different way.
Yes, that seem
On Monday 10 June 2013 06:19 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 04:33:04PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
IIUC, normal enable should be when output is driven through OUT2.
I'm sorry but you're really not making much sense at all here. You say
th
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 04:33:04PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> On Monday 10 June 2013 03:33 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 03:20:06PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> >>SMPS10 has two outputs OUT2 and OUT1. In order to connect OUT2 to
> >>OUT1 we have to set "SWI
Hi,
On Monday 10 June 2013 03:33 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 03:20:06PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
On Tuesday 04 June 2013 03:35 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 03:13:27PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
On Tuesday 04 June 2013 03:08 PM, Mark Bro
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 03:20:06PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 June 2013 03:35 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 03:13:27PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> >>On Tuesday 04 June 2013 03:08 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >>>No. A boost regulator is still a vo
Hi,
On Tuesday 04 June 2013 03:35 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 03:13:27PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
On Tuesday 04 June 2013 03:08 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
No. A boost regulator is still a voltage regulator, it just happens to
raise rather than lower the voltage but
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 03:13:27PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 June 2013 03:08 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >No. A boost regulator is still a voltage regulator, it just happens to
> >raise rather than lower the voltage but it's otherwise a normal
> >regulator. I'm not sure wh
Hi,
On Tuesday 04 June 2013 03:08 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 02:38:08PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
On Sunday 02 June 2013 02:35 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
This is still not making any sense. The quality of regulation and
output voltage are essentially orthogonal, and
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 02:38:08PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> On Sunday 02 June 2013 02:35 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >This is still not making any sense. The quality of regulation and
> >output voltage are essentially orthogonal, and obviously there's a
> >specific API for bypass which
Hi,
On Sunday 02 June 2013 02:35 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 12:33:10AM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
On Sunday 02 June 2013 12:15 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
No, that makes no sense at all to me. Why do you think this maps onto
the set mode API? Modes are all about accuracy of
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 12:33:10AM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> On Sunday 02 June 2013 12:15 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >No, that makes no sense at all to me. Why do you think this maps onto
> >the set mode API? Modes are all about accuracy of regulation.
> I mapped this to the regulation under
On Sunday 02 June 2013 12:15 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 06:30:32PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
Palma have SMPS10 regulator which can generate two voltage level
3.75 and 5V.
This SMPS10 has the two outputs OUT1 and OUT2 and having one input IN
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 06:30:32PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> Palma have SMPS10 regulator which can generate two voltage level
> 3.75 and 5V.
> This SMPS10 has the two outputs OUT1 and OUT2 and having one input IN1.
> SMPS10-OUT2 is always connected to SMPS10-IN1 via following logic:
> - Thr
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 06:24:37PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> On Thursday 30 May 2013 05:02 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 04:26:33PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> >>Only compile tested. Just sent a patch to get some comments
> >>/ideas on how to handle such
HI Mark,
On Thursday 30 May 2013 05:02 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 04:26:33PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
Only compile tested. Just sent a patch to get some comments
/ideas on how to handle such one off regulators.
to handle
What's un
Hi,
On Thursday 30 May 2013 05:02 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 04:26:33PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
Only compile tested. Just sent a patch to get some comments
/ideas on how to handle such one off regulators.
to handle
What's unclear or confusing? This all looks
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 04:26:33PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Only compile tested. Just sent a patch to get some comments
> /ideas on how to handle such one off regulators.
> to handle
What's unclear or confusing? This all looks really basic...
> + palmas_smps_read(pmic->palmas,
SMPS10 supports different modes such as BOOST mode, BYPASS mode and
SWITCH. Inorder to configure SMPS10 in these modes,
added palmas_set_mode_smps10() and palmas_get_mode_smps10() for the
consumers of SMPS10 to configure it accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I
---
Only compile teste
23 matches
Mail list logo
