If people want to use multiple queues they should use blk-mq, period.
And while we can't just rip out existing code in lpfc that supports
multiple queues without blk-mq we should not let any new users in
either.
On 11/08/2016 04:11 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:08:51PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
The use-case here is that one needs to feed the MSI-X index into the driver
command structure. While we can extract that number trivially with scsi-mq,
but for scsi-sq we don't have
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:08:51PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> The use-case here is that one needs to feed the MSI-X index into the driver
> command structure. While we can extract that number trivially with scsi-mq,
> but for scsi-sq we don't have such means.
> The main impetus of this RFC
On 11/08/2016 03:56 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 08:47:21AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
Add a reverse-mapping function to return the interrupt vector for
any CPU if interrupt affinity is enabled.
What's the use case of it?
Also as-is this won't work due to the non-af
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 08:47:21AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Add a reverse-mapping function to return the interrupt vector for
> any CPU if interrupt affinity is enabled.
What's the use case of it?
Also as-is this won't work due to the non-affinity vectors that
have the affinity set to all
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Add a reverse-mapping function to return the interrupt vector for
> any CPU if interrupt affinity is enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke
> ---
> drivers/pci/msi.c | 36
> include/linux/pci.h | 1 +
> 2
Add a reverse-mapping function to return the interrupt vector for
any CPU if interrupt affinity is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke
---
drivers/pci/msi.c | 36
include/linux/pci.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/ms
7 matches
Mail list logo