On Thu 27-07-17 11:30:50, Wenwei Tao wrote:
> 2017-07-26 21:44 GMT+08:00 Michal Hocko :
> > On Wed 26-07-17 21:07:42, Wenwei Tao wrote:
[...]
> >> I think there is a css double put in mem_cgroup_iter. Under reclaim,
> >> we call mem_cgroup_iter the first time with prev == NULL, and we get
> >> last
2017-07-26 21:44 GMT+08:00 Michal Hocko :
> On Wed 26-07-17 21:07:42, Wenwei Tao wrote:
>> From: Wenwei Tao
>>
>> By removing the child cgroup while the parent cgroup is
>> under reclaim, we could trigger the following kernel panic
>> on kernel 3.10:
>>
On Wed 26-07-17 21:07:42, Wenwei Tao wrote:
> From: Wenwei Tao
>
> By removing the child cgroup while the parent cgroup is
> under reclaim, we could trigger the following kernel panic
> on kernel 3.10:
>
> kernel BUG at kern
From: Wenwei Tao
By removing the child cgroup while the parent cgroup is
under reclaim, we could trigger the following kernel panic
on kernel 3.10:
kernel BUG at kernel/cgroup.c:893!
invalid opcode: [#1] SMP
CPU: 1 PI
4 matches
Mail list logo