On 12/01/2012 01:38 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 4:26 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
So as a quick concept hack I wrote the patch attached below.
(It's not signed off, see the patch description text for the
reason.)
Well, it confirms that anon_vma locking is a big problem, but a
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> I'll try the rwsem and see how it goes?
Yeah. That should be an easy conversion (just convert everything to
use the write-lock first, and then you can make one or two migration
places use the read version).
Side note: The mutex code tends t
* Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 4:26 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> >
> > So as a quick concept hack I wrote the patch attached below.
> > (It's not signed off, see the patch description text for the
> > reason.)
>
> Well, it confirms that anon_vma locking is a big problem, but
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 4:26 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
>
> So as a quick concept hack I wrote the patch attached below.
> (It's not signed off, see the patch description text for the
> reason.)
Well, it confirms that anon_vma locking is a big problem, but as
outlined in my other email it's complete
* Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 1)
>
> This patch might solve the remapping
> (remove_migration_ptes()), but does not solve the anon-vma
> locking done in the first, unmapping step of pte-migration -
> which is done via try_to_unmap(): which is a generic VM
> function used by swapout too, so callers
5 matches
Mail list logo