On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 25, 2013 02:52:26 PM Kyungmin Park wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> > On Tuesday, August 20, 2013 08:27:27 AM Tejun Heo wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 02:34:14PM +0200,
On Wednesday, September 25, 2013 02:52:26 PM Kyungmin Park wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 20, 2013 08:27:27 AM Tejun Heo wrote:
> >> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 02:34:14PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> > On Tuesday, August 20, 2013 08:2
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 20, 2013 08:27:27 AM Tejun Heo wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 02:34:14PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> > On Tuesday, August 20, 2013 08:22:00 AM Tejun Heo wrote:
>> > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 02:30:18PM +0200,
On Tuesday, August 20, 2013 08:27:27 AM Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 02:34:14PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 20, 2013 08:22:00 AM Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 02:30:18PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > So, I don't think we can simp
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 02:34:14PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 20, 2013 08:22:00 AM Tejun Heo wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 02:30:18PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > So, I don't think we can simply turn TASK_UNITERRUPTIBLE to
> > > > TASK_KILLABLE at this poin
On Tuesday, August 20, 2013 08:22:00 AM Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 02:30:18PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > So, I don't think we can simply turn TASK_UNITERRUPTIBLE to
> > > TASK_KILLABLE at this point. We really need to strictly define where
> > > a task can freeze before
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 02:30:18PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > So, I don't think we can simply turn TASK_UNITERRUPTIBLE to
> > TASK_KILLABLE at this point. We really need to strictly define where
> > a task can freeze before being able to do anything like this.
>
> But we could do that fo
On Tuesday, August 20, 2013 08:18:19 AM Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 02:23:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 20, 2013 01:20:03 PM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > Change __refrigerator() to allow SIGKILL signal handling during
> > > the froz
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 02:23:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 20, 2013 01:20:03 PM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > Change __refrigerator() to allow SIGKILL signal handling during
> > the frozen state (by setting task to a TASK_KILLABLE state instead
> > of TAS
On Tuesday, August 20, 2013 01:20:03 PM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Change __refrigerator() to allow SIGKILL signal handling during
> the frozen state (by setting task to a TASK_KILLABLE state instead
> of TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE one before entering sleep) and make tasks
> leave __refrigerator(
10 matches
Mail list logo