On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 04:34:02PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 02:35:52PM +, Priit Laes wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 04:52:27PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 10:03:09AM +, Priit Laes wrote:
> > > > > > I'm concerne
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 02:35:52PM +, Priit Laes wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 04:52:27PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 10:03:09AM +, Priit Laes wrote:
> > > > > I'm concerned for other users of the PLL-PERIPH clock. AFAIK
> > > > > all of them, exc
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 04:52:27PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 10:03:09AM +, Priit Laes wrote:
> > > > I'm concerned for other users of the PLL-PERIPH clock. AFAIK
> > > > all of them, except the HRTIMER, expect the clock rate to stay
> > > > the same and not
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 10:03:09AM +, Priit Laes wrote:
> > > I'm concerned for other users of the PLL-PERIPH clock. AFAIK
> > > all of them, except the HRTIMER, expect the clock rate to stay
> > > the same and not change underneath them. And SATA expects it to
> > > be at 600 MHz, as the
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 10:20:00AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 09:44:02PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 5:45 PM Maxime Ripard
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Feb 02, 2019 at 05:52:09PM +0200, Priit Laes wrote:
> > > > Recent patch of improving MP c
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 09:44:02PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 5:45 PM Maxime Ripard
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 02, 2019 at 05:52:09PM +0200, Priit Laes wrote:
> > > Recent patch of improving MP clock rate calculations by taking
> > > into account whether adjusting paren
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 5:45 PM Maxime Ripard wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 02, 2019 at 05:52:09PM +0200, Priit Laes wrote:
> > Recent patch of improving MP clock rate calculations by taking
> > into account whether adjusting parent rate is allowed, have
> > unfortunately broken eMMC support on A20 Olinux
On Sat, Feb 02, 2019 at 05:52:09PM +0200, Priit Laes wrote:
> Recent patch of improving MP clock rate calculations by taking
> into account whether adjusting parent rate is allowed, have
> unfortunately broken eMMC support on A20 Olinuxino-Lime2-eMMC
> boards which fail with following error:
>
> [
Recent patch of improving MP clock rate calculations by taking
into account whether adjusting parent rate is allowed, have
unfortunately broken eMMC support on A20 Olinuxino-Lime2-eMMC
boards which fail with following error:
[snip]
EXT4-fs (mmcblk1p4): INFO: recovery required on readonly filesyste
9 matches
Mail list logo