* Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > Willing to write a changelog with the pointer to the actual
> > oops that happens due to this issue?
>
> I don't have a link, so reproduced/captured it. With
> systemd-sysvinit (bleh) installed, it's trivial to reproduce:
>
> Add echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_a
On Sun, 2012-12-02 at 11:36 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Mike Galbraith wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 2012-12-01 at 22:44 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >>
> >> > Should we use some other file for that - or no file at all and
> >> > just emi
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 2012-12-01 at 22:44 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> > Should we use some other file for that - or no file at all and
>> > just emit a bootup printk for kernel hackers with a short
>> > attention span?
>>
* Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-12-01 at 22:44 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > Should we use some other file for that - or no file at all and
> > just emit a bootup printk for kernel hackers with a short
> > attention span?
>
> Or, whack the file and don't bother with a printk either.
On Sat, 2012-12-01 at 22:44 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Should we use some other file for that - or no file at all and
> just emit a bootup printk for kernel hackers with a short
> attention span?
Or, whack the file and don't bother with a printk either. If it's in
your config, and your comman
On Sat, 2012-12-01 at 14:03 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > You are not missing anything. That flag is my fault not Mike's:
> > I booted the initial version of that patch but was unsure
> > whether autogroups was enabled - it's a pretty tr
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> You are not missing anything. That flag is my fault not Mike's:
> I booted the initial version of that patch but was unsure
> whether autogroups was enabled - it's a pretty transparent
> feature. So I figured that having that flag (but readonl
* Ingo Molnar wrote:
> You are not missing anything. That flag is my fault not
> Mike's: I booted the initial version of that patch but was
> unsure whether autogroups was enabled - it's a pretty
> transparent feature. So I figured that having that flag (but
> readonly) would give us this in
* Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 3:16 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > Please [RFC] pull the latest sched-urgent-for-linus git tree
> > from:
>
> No. That patch is braindead. I wouldn't pull it even if it
> wasn't this late.
>
> Why the hell leave a read-only 'sched_autogroup_e
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 3:16 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> Please [RFC] pull the latest sched-urgent-for-linus git tree
> from:
No. That patch is braindead. I wouldn't pull it even if it wasn't this late.
Why the hell leave a read-only 'sched_autogroup_enabled' proc file?
What the f*ck is the point?
Linus,
Please [RFC] pull the latest sched-urgent-for-linus git tree
from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git
sched-urgent-for-linus
HEAD: 5258f386ea4e8454bc801fb443e8a4217da1947c sched/autogroup: Fix crash on
reboot when autogroup is disabled
Larger and scarier t
11 matches
Mail list logo
