On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 08:39:13PM +0100, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 7:00 PM, Joel Fernandes (Google)
> wrote:
> > pstore currently calls persistent_ram_save_old even if a buffer is
> > empty. While this appears to work, it is simply not the right thing to
> > do and could lead to
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 7:00 PM, Joel Fernandes (Google)
wrote:
> pstore currently calls persistent_ram_save_old even if a buffer is
> empty. While this appears to work, it is simply not the right thing to
> do and could lead to bugs so lets avoid that. It also prevent misleading
> prints in the l
pstore currently calls persistent_ram_save_old even if a buffer is
empty. While this appears to work, it is simply not the right thing to
do and could lead to bugs so lets avoid that. It also prevent misleading
prints in the logs which claim the buffer is valid.
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Goog
3 matches
Mail list logo
