On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:28:59PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 3:44 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:58:32AM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> >> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 12:00:33PM -0400, Dan Str
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 3:44 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:58:32AM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 12:00:33PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
>> >> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Minchan Kim wrote
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:58:32AM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 12:00:33PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> >> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >> > On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 03:39:13PM -0400, Dan Str
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 12:00:33PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> > On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 03:39:13PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 12:00:33PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 03:39:13PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >> > Hi Heesub,
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 0
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 03:39:13PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> > Hi Heesub,
>> >
>> > On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 03:26:14PM +0900, Heesub Shin wrote:
>> >> Hello Minchan,
>> >>
>> >> First
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 03:39:13PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > Hi Heesub,
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 03:26:14PM +0900, Heesub Shin wrote:
> >> Hello Minchan,
> >>
> >> First of all, I agree with the overall purpose of your patch set.
>
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi Heesub,
>
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 03:26:14PM +0900, Heesub Shin wrote:
>> Hello Minchan,
>>
>> First of all, I agree with the overall purpose of your patch set.
>
> Thank you.
>
>>
>> On 09/04/2014 10:39 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> >This patc
Hi Heesub,
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 03:26:14PM +0900, Heesub Shin wrote:
> Hello Minchan,
>
> First of all, I agree with the overall purpose of your patch set.
Thank you.
>
> On 09/04/2014 10:39 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >This patch implement SWAP_GET_FREE handler in zram so that VM can
> >know
Hello Minchan,
First of all, I agree with the overall purpose of your patch set.
On 09/04/2014 10:39 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
This patch implement SWAP_GET_FREE handler in zram so that VM can
know how many zram has freeable space.
VM can use it to stop anonymous reclaiming once zram is full.
Sig
This patch implement SWAP_GET_FREE handler in zram so that VM can
know how many zram has freeable space.
VM can use it to stop anonymous reclaiming once zram is full.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim
---
drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 18 ++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --gi
11 matches
Mail list logo