On 09-09-19, 08:56, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> >> -struct dma_chan *dma_request_chan_by_mask(const dma_cap_mask_t *mask)
> >> +struct dma_chan *dma_domain_request_chan_by_mask(struct device *dev,
> >> + const dma_cap_mask_t *mask)
> >
> > should we really us
On 08/09/2019 15.15, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 06-09-19, 17:18, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> In case the channel is not requested via the slave API, use the
>> of_find_dma_domain() to see if a system default DMA controller is
>> specified.
>>
>> Add new function which can be used by clients to request
On 06-09-19, 17:18, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> In case the channel is not requested via the slave API, use the
> of_find_dma_domain() to see if a system default DMA controller is
> specified.
>
> Add new function which can be used by clients to request channels by mask
> from their DMA domain control
On 06/09/2019 17.18, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> In case the channel is not requested via the slave API, use the
> of_find_dma_domain() to see if a system default DMA controller is
> specified.
>
> Add new function which can be used by clients to request channels by mask
> from their DMA domain con
In case the channel is not requested via the slave API, use the
of_find_dma_domain() to see if a system default DMA controller is
specified.
Add new function which can be used by clients to request channels by mask
from their DMA domain controller if specified.
Client drivers can take advantage o
In case the channel is not requested via the slave API, use the
of_find_dma_domain() to see if a system default DMA controller is
specified.
Add new function which can be used by clients to request channels by mask
from their DMA domain controller if specified.
Client drivers can take advantage o
6 matches
Mail list logo
