Hi Miklos,
On 29/04/14 12:24, Szeredi Miklos wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 2:41 PM, James Hogan wrote:
>
>> It appears Miklos Szeredi beat me to it with patch 1 (adding renameat2
>> syscall to asm-generic unistd.h), and will be submitting it to Linus
>> at some point as part of his renameat2
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 2:41 PM, James Hogan wrote:
> It appears Miklos Szeredi beat me to it with patch 1 (adding renameat2
> syscall to asm-generic unistd.h), and will be submitting it to Linus
> at some point as part of his renameat2 series.
> Miklos: Do you think it makes sense for you to inc
On 23 April 2014 13:18, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 April 2014, James Hogan wrote:
>> The new renameat2 syscall provides all the functionality provided by the
>> renameat syscall and adds flags, so future architectures won't need to
>> include renameat.
>>
>> Therefore drop the renameat
On Wednesday 23 April 2014, James Hogan wrote:
> The new renameat2 syscall provides all the functionality provided by the
> renameat syscall and adds flags, so future architectures won't need to
> include renameat.
>
> Therefore drop the renameat syscall from the generic syscall list unless
> __AR
The new renameat2 syscall provides all the functionality provided by the
renameat syscall and adds flags, so future architectures won't need to
include renameat.
Therefore drop the renameat syscall from the generic syscall list unless
__ARCH_WANT_RENAMEAT is defined by the architecture's unistd.h
5 matches
Mail list logo
