Re: [RFC 1/1] Char: isicom, remove tty_{hang,wake}up bottomhalves

2006-12-14 Thread Alan
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:35:17 +0100 (CET) Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > isicom, remove tty_{hang,wake}up bottomhalves > > - tty_hangup() itself schedules work, so there is no need to schedule hangup > in the driver > - tty_wakeup() its safe to call it while in atomic (IS THIS CORRECT?)

[RFC 1/1] Char: isicom, remove tty_{hang,wake}up bottomhalves

2006-12-13 Thread Jiri Slaby
isicom, remove tty_{hang,wake}up bottomhalves - tty_hangup() itself schedules work, so there is no need to schedule hangup in the driver - tty_wakeup() its safe to call it while in atomic (IS THIS CORRECT?), so that its schedule_work might be also wiped out Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL P