Re: [RFC 00/17] clk: Add per-controller locks to fix deadlocks

2016-11-11 Thread Stephen Boyd
On 11/04, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > Krzysztof has left Samsung, but we would like to continue this task, because > the ABBA dead-locks related to global prepare lock becomes more and more > problematic for us to workaround. Hmm. Ok. Thanks for the info. > > On 2016-09-09 02:24,

Re: [RFC 00/17] clk: Add per-controller locks to fix deadlocks

2016-11-04 Thread Marek Szyprowski
Hi Stephen, Krzysztof has left Samsung, but we would like to continue this task, because the ABBA dead-locks related to global prepare lock becomes more and more problematic for us to workaround. On 2016-09-09 02:24, Stephen Boyd wrote: On 08/16, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: RFC, please, do not

Re: [RFC 00/17] clk: Add per-controller locks to fix deadlocks

2016-09-08 Thread Stephen Boyd
On 08/16, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Hi, > > RFC, please, do not apply, maybe except patch #1 which is harmless. > > > Introduction > > The patchset brings new entity: clock controller representing a hardware > block. The clock controller comes with its own prepare lock which > i

Re: [RFC 00/17] clk: Add per-controller locks to fix deadlocks

2016-08-20 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 03:31:08PM -0400, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Hello Krzysztof, > > On 08/16/2016 09:34 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > Hi, > > > > RFC, please, do not apply, maybe except patch #1 which is harmless. > > > > > > Introduction > > > > The patchset brin

Re: [RFC 00/17] clk: Add per-controller locks to fix deadlocks

2016-08-19 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
Hello Krzysztof, On 08/16/2016 09:34 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Hi, > > RFC, please, do not apply, maybe except patch #1 which is harmless. > > > Introduction > > The patchset brings new entity: clock controller representing a hardware > block. The clock controller comes wit

Re: [RFC 00/17] clk: Add per-controller locks to fix deadlocks

2016-08-19 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 03:46:40PM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 03:51:10PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 08/16/2016 03:34 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > RFC, please, do not apply, maybe except patch #1 which is harmless. > > > > > > > >

Re: [RFC 00/17] clk: Add per-controller locks to fix deadlocks

2016-08-19 Thread Charles Keepax
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 03:51:10PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 08/16/2016 03:34 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > Hi, > > > > RFC, please, do not apply, maybe except patch #1 which is harmless. > > > > > > Introduction > > > > The patchset brings new entity: clock contro

Re: [RFC 00/17] clk: Add per-controller locks to fix deadlocks

2016-08-16 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On 08/16/2016 03:34 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Hi, > > RFC, please, do not apply, maybe except patch #1 which is harmless. > > > Introduction > > The patchset brings new entity: clock controller representing a hardware > block. The clock controller comes with its own prepare

[RFC 00/17] clk: Add per-controller locks to fix deadlocks

2016-08-16 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
Hi, RFC, please, do not apply, maybe except patch #1 which is harmless. Introduction The patchset brings new entity: clock controller representing a hardware block. The clock controller comes with its own prepare lock which is used then in many places. The idea is to fix the deadl