Re: [RFC 00/14] perf tests: Check on subtest for user specified test

2020-05-26 Thread Jiri Olsa
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 11:23:00AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Mon, May 25, 2020 at 12:42:05AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > > hi, > > changes for using metric result in another metric seem > > to change lot of core metric code, so it's better we > > have some more tests before we do

Re: [RFC 00/14] perf tests: Check on subtest for user specified test

2020-05-25 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Mon, May 25, 2020 at 12:42:05AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > hi, > changes for using metric result in another metric seem > to change lot of core metric code, so it's better we > have some more tests before we do that. > > Sending as RFC as it's still alive and you guys might > have some other

Re: [RFC 00/14] perf tests: Check on subtest for user specified test

2020-05-25 Thread Jiri Olsa
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 02:06:07PM +0200, Michael Petlan wrote: > On Mon, 25 May 2020, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > hi, > > changes for using metric result in another metric seem > > to change lot of core metric code, so it's better we > > have some more tests before we do that. > > > > Sending as RFC as

Re: [RFC 00/14] perf tests: Check on subtest for user specified test

2020-05-25 Thread Michael Petlan
On Mon, 25 May 2020, Jiri Olsa wrote: > hi, > changes for using metric result in another metric seem > to change lot of core metric code, so it's better we > have some more tests before we do that. > > Sending as RFC as it's still alive and you guys might > have some other idea of how to do this.

[RFC 00/14] perf tests: Check on subtest for user specified test

2020-05-24 Thread Jiri Olsa
hi, changes for using metric result in another metric seem to change lot of core metric code, so it's better we have some more tests before we do that. Sending as RFC as it's still alive and you guys might have some other idea of how to do this. Also available in here: git://git.kernel.org/pub/