Re: [RFC 0/5] Enable f2fs support inline data

2013-08-07 Thread Jaegeuk Kim
Hi Huajun, Sorry for the long delay. I've been too busy to catch up this new big feature. Anyway, do you guys still design or focus on this issue? Nowadays, I can afford to dive into this issue. So, if you have done any progress so far, can you share it with me? Otherwise, I'd like to start to de

Re: [RFC 0/5] Enable f2fs support inline data

2013-06-09 Thread Jaegeuk Kim
Hi, 2013-06-08 (토), 15:25 +0800, Huajun Li: > > Hi Jaegeuk, > Thanks for your suggestion. > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Jaegeuk Kim > wrote: > Hi Haicheng, > 2013-06-04 (화), 14:01 +0800, Haicheng Li: > > Hi Jaegeuk & Namjae, > > > > Sure, we'll addres

Re: [RFC 0/5] Enable f2fs support inline data

2013-06-05 Thread Jaegeuk Kim
Hi Haicheng, 2013-06-04 (화), 14:01 +0800, Haicheng Li: > Hi Jaegeuk & Namjae, > > Sure, we'll address your comments. And this version is RFC, just wanna to > make sure this feature is meaningful for f2fs project, and there is no obvious > mistake, e.g. missing some critical path. IMO, it is wort

Re: [RFC 0/5] Enable f2fs support inline data

2013-06-03 Thread Haicheng Li
Hi Jaegeuk & Namjae, Sure, we'll address your comments. And this version is RFC, just wanna to make sure this feature is meaningful for f2fs project, and there is no obvious mistake, e.g. missing some critical path. And if you team has some special opensource test suites used in your daily f2fs t

Re: [RFC 0/5] Enable f2fs support inline data

2013-06-03 Thread Namjae Jeon
Hi. Huajun. I agree jaegeuk's opinion. Additionally, It is better that you describe the effect in change-log when this feature is added to f2fs. e.g. 1. how much space is saved when storing kernel-tree(small files) ? 2. small files creation performance test. 3. file look-up performance

Re: [RFC 0/5] Enable f2fs support inline data

2013-06-03 Thread Jaegeuk Kim
Hi, This feature is one of my todo items. ;) Thank you for the contribution. Before reviewing the below code intensively, we need to check the following issues. - deadlock conditions - FS consistency - recovery routine Could you check one more time? Thanks again, 2013-06-03 (월), 18:04 +0800, H

[RFC 0/5] Enable f2fs support inline data

2013-06-03 Thread Huajun Li
f2fs inode is so large, small files can be stored directly in the inode, rather than just storing a single block address and storing the data elsewhere. This RFC patch set is just to enable f2fs support inline data: files less than about 3.6K can be stored directly in inode block. TODO: make smal