On Wed 12-02-14 16:28:36, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> Hi, Michal!
>
> Sorry for a long reply.
>
> At Wed, 29 Jan 2014 19:22:59 +0100,
> Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > As you can remember, I've proposed to introduce low limits about a year
> > > ago.
> > >
> > > We had a small discussion at that time:
>
Hi, Michal!
Sorry for a long reply.
At Wed, 29 Jan 2014 19:22:59 +0100,
Michal Hocko wrote:
> > As you can remember, I've proposed to introduce low limits about a year ago.
> >
> > We had a small discussion at that time: http://marc.info/?t=13619522664
> > .
>
> yes I remember that discuss
On Mon, Feb 03 2014, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 30-01-14 16:28:27, Greg Thelen wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 30 2014, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed 29-01-14 11:08:46, Greg Thelen wrote:
>> > [...]
>> >> The series looks useful. We (Google) have been using something similar.
>> >> In practice such
On Thu 30-01-14 16:28:27, Greg Thelen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30 2014, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> > On Wed 29-01-14 11:08:46, Greg Thelen wrote:
> > [...]
> >> The series looks useful. We (Google) have been using something similar.
> >> In practice such a low_limit (or memory guarantee), doesn't nest v
On Thu, Jan 30 2014, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 29-01-14 11:08:46, Greg Thelen wrote:
> [...]
>> The series looks useful. We (Google) have been using something similar.
>> In practice such a low_limit (or memory guarantee), doesn't nest very
>> well.
>>
>> Example:
>> - parent_memcg: limit 5
On Wed 29-01-14 11:08:46, Greg Thelen wrote:
[...]
> The series looks useful. We (Google) have been using something similar.
> In practice such a low_limit (or memory guarantee), doesn't nest very
> well.
>
> Example:
> - parent_memcg: limit 500, low_limit 500, usage 500
> 1 privately charg
On Wed, Dec 11 2013, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Hi,
> previous discussions have shown that soft limits cannot be reformed
> (http://lwn.net/Articles/555249/). This series introduces an alternative
> approach to protecting memory allocated to processes executing within
> a memory cgroup controller. It i
On Fri 24-01-14 15:07:02, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> Hi, Michal!
Hi,
> As you can remember, I've proposed to introduce low limits about a year ago.
>
> We had a small discussion at that time: http://marc.info/?t=13619522664 .
yes I remember that discussion and vaguely remember the proposed
app
Hi, Michal!
As you can remember, I've proposed to introduce low limits about a year ago.
We had a small discussion at that time: http://marc.info/?t=13619522664 .
Since that time we intensively use low limits in our production
(on thousands of machines). So, I'm very interested to merge thi
Hi,
previous discussions have shown that soft limits cannot be reformed
(http://lwn.net/Articles/555249/). This series introduces an alternative
approach to protecting memory allocated to processes executing within
a memory cgroup controller. It is based on a new tunable that was
discussed with Joh
10 matches
Mail list logo
