Re: [RFC 0/2] ns: introduce binfmt_misc namespace

2018-10-01 Thread Dmitry Safonov
Hi Laurent, thanks for Cc, On Mon, 2018-10-01 at 09:13 +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote: > Le 01/10/2018 à 06:45, Andy Lutomirski a écrit : > > On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 4:47 PM Laurent Vivier > > wrote: > > > > > > This series introduces a new namespace for binfmt_misc. > > > > > > > This seems conc

Re: [RFC 0/2] ns: introduce binfmt_misc namespace

2018-10-01 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Laurent Vivier writes: > Le 01/10/2018 à 09:21, Eric W. Biederman a écrit : >> Andy Lutomirski writes: >> >>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 4:47 PM Laurent Vivier wrote: This series introduces a new namespace for binfmt_misc. >>> >>> This seems conceptually quite reasonable, but I'm w

Re: [RFC 0/2] ns: introduce binfmt_misc namespace

2018-10-01 Thread Laurent Vivier
Le 01/10/2018 à 09:21, Eric W. Biederman a écrit : > Andy Lutomirski writes: > >> On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 4:47 PM Laurent Vivier wrote: >>> >>> This series introduces a new namespace for binfmt_misc. >>> >> >> This seems conceptually quite reasonable, but I'm wondering if the >> number of namesp

Re: [RFC 0/2] ns: introduce binfmt_misc namespace

2018-10-01 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Andy Lutomirski writes: > On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 4:47 PM Laurent Vivier wrote: >> >> This series introduces a new namespace for binfmt_misc. >> > > This seems conceptually quite reasonable, but I'm wondering if the > number of namespace types is getting out of hand given the current > API. Sho

Re: [RFC 0/2] ns: introduce binfmt_misc namespace

2018-10-01 Thread Laurent Vivier
Le 01/10/2018 à 06:45, Andy Lutomirski a écrit : > On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 4:47 PM Laurent Vivier wrote: >> >> This series introduces a new namespace for binfmt_misc. >> > > This seems conceptually quite reasonable, but I'm wondering if the > number of namespace types is getting out of hand given

Re: [RFC 0/2] ns: introduce binfmt_misc namespace

2018-09-30 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 4:47 PM Laurent Vivier wrote: > > This series introduces a new namespace for binfmt_misc. > This seems conceptually quite reasonable, but I'm wondering if the number of namespace types is getting out of hand given the current API. Should we be considering whether we need

[RFC 0/2] ns: introduce binfmt_misc namespace

2018-09-30 Thread Laurent Vivier
This series introduces a new namespace for binfmt_misc. This allows to define a new interpreter for each new container. But the main goal is to be able to chroot to a directory using a binfmt_misc interpreter without being root. I have a modified version of unshare at: g...@github.com:vivier/