On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 7:23 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> On Fri, 20 Sep 2019, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> > On 20/09/19 08:27, Suleiman Souhlal wrote:
> > > To do that, I am changing kvmclock to request to the host to copy
> > > its timekeeping parameters (mult, base, cycle_last, etc), so that
> >
On Fri, 20 Sep 2019, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 20/09/19 08:27, Suleiman Souhlal wrote:
> > To do that, I am changing kvmclock to request to the host to copy
> > its timekeeping parameters (mult, base, cycle_last, etc), so that
> > the guest timekeeper can use the same values, so that time can
> >
On 20/09/19 08:27, Suleiman Souhlal wrote:
> To do that, I am changing kvmclock to request to the host to copy
> its timekeeping parameters (mult, base, cycle_last, etc), so that
> the guest timekeeper can use the same values, so that time can
> be synchronized between the guest and the host.
>
>
This RFC is to try to solve the following problem:
We have some applications that are currently running in their
own namespace, that still talk to other processes on the
machine, using IPC, and expect to run on the same machine.
We want to move them into a virtual machine, for the usual
benefits
4 matches
Mail list logo