> -Original Message-
> From: Serge E. Hallyn [mailto:se...@hallyn.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 9:50 PM
> To: Chen, Hanxiao/陈 晗霄
> Cc: Serge Hallyn; Richard Weinberger (rich...@nod.at);
[snip]
> > > I like your proc approach. Do you have an implementation?
> >
> > Thanks for yo
Quoting chenhanx...@cn.fujitsu.com (chenhanx...@cn.fujitsu.com):
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Serge Hallyn [mailto:serge.hal...@ubuntu.com]
> > Sent: Friday, August 08, 2014 12:12 AM
> > To: Chen, Hanxiao/陈 晗霄
>
> > > > How much more kernel space does this take up?
> > > >
> > >
> -Original Message-
> From: Serge Hallyn [mailto:serge.hal...@ubuntu.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 08, 2014 12:12 AM
> To: Chen, Hanxiao/陈 晗霄
> > > How much more kernel space does this take up?
> > >
> >
> > Only first process when creating new ns will be add here.
> > So there would not
Quoting chenhanx...@cn.fujitsu.com (chenhanx...@cn.fujitsu.com):
> Hi,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Serge Hallyn [mailto:serge.hal...@ubuntu.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 6:21 AM
> >
> > Quoting chenhanx...@cn.fujitsu.com (chenhanx...@cn.fujitsu.com):
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
/nspid/ns0/ns1/ns2
> > Then we knew that t4 have pid 9 in ns2, have pid 8 in ns1.
> >
> > Any comments would be warmly welcomed!
> >
> > Thanks,
> > - Chen
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: containers-boun...@lists.linux-
6:34 PM
> > To: Eric W. Biederman (ebied...@xmission.com); Serge Hallyn
> > (serge.hal...@ubuntu.com); Oleg Nesterov (o...@redhat.com); Richard
> > Weinberger
> > (rich...@nod.at); Pavel Emelyanov (xe...@parallels.com); Vasily Kulikov
> > (seg...@openwall.com); Gotou,
; > From: Serge Hallyn [mailto:serge.hal...@ubuntu.com]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 12:16 PM
> > > > To: Chen, Hanxiao/陈 晗霄
> > > > Subject: Re: [RFC]Pid conversion between pid namespace
> > > > > A-2) syscall pid_t getns
day, July 15, 2014 12:16 PM
> > > To: Chen, Hanxiao/陈 晗霄
> > > Subject: Re: [RFC]Pid conversion between pid namespace
> > > > A-2) syscall pid_t getnspid(pid_t query_pid, pid_t observer_pid)
> > > > pros:
> > > > - ns procfs fr
Quoting chenhanx...@cn.fujitsu.com (chenhanx...@cn.fujitsu.com):
> Hi,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Serge Hallyn [mailto:serge.hal...@ubuntu.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 12:16 PM
> > To: Chen, Hanxiao/陈 晗霄
> > Subject: Re: [RFC]
om)'
> Cc: contain...@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: RE: [RFC]Pid conversion between pid namespace
>
> Hi,
>
> Let me summarize our discussions of ID conversion by pros/cons:
>
> A) make new system call for translation
> A-1) systemcall
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Serge Hallyn [mailto:serge.hal...@ubuntu.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 12:16 PM
> To: Chen, Hanxiao/陈 晗霄
> Subject: Re: [RFC]Pid conversion between pid namespace
> > A-2) syscall pid_t getnspid(pid_t query_pid, pid_t obser
g a new proc file just under /proc
> to show the hierarchy like readlink did:
> pid:[4026531836]-> [4026532390] -> [4026532484]
> pid:[4026531836]-> [4026532491]
> (A 3 level pid and 2 level pid_
>
> Any comments would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
d 2 level pid_
Any comments would be appreciated.
Thanks,
- Chen
> -Original Message-
> Subject: [RFC]Pid conversion between pid namespace
>
> Hi,
>
> We had some discussions on how to carry out
> pid conversion between pid namespace via:
> syscall[1] and procf
Chen-san,
I would like to recommend that you summarize pros/cons for all ideas so far.
For example,
-
A) make new system call for transrate
A-1) systemcall(ID, NS1, NS2) into (ID).
pros:
- foo
- baa
cons:
- hoge
- hogehogehoge
A-2) pi
Hi,
We had some discussions on how to carry out
pid conversion between pid namespace via:
syscall[1] and procfs[2].
Pavel suggested that a syscall like
(ID, NS1, NS2) into (ID).
Serge suggested that a syscall
pid_t getnspid(pid_t query_pid, pid_t observer_pid).
Eric and Richard suggested a pr
15 matches
Mail list logo
