Re: [RFC] shared regulator initialization and protection

2016-04-18 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 03:26:03PM +0800, Pingbo Wen wrote: > On Tuesday, April 12, 2016 11:48 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:44:11AM +0800, Pingbo Wen wrote: > > What is the actual problem here? Every driver is responsible for > > ensuring that regulators are in a good stat

Re: [RFC] shared regulator initialization and protection

2016-04-18 Thread Pingbo Wen
Hi, Mark On Tuesday, April 12, 2016 11:48 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:44:11AM +0800, Pingbo Wen wrote: > > Please fix your mail client to word wrap within paragraphs at something > substantially less than 80 columns. Doing this makes your messages much > easier to read and

Re: [RFC] shared regulator initialization and protection

2016-04-11 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:44:11AM +0800, Pingbo Wen wrote: Please fix your mail client to word wrap within paragraphs at something substantially less than 80 columns. Doing this makes your messages much easier to read and reply to. > Those day, I get some fuzz idea in a proxy-consumer regulator

[RFC] shared regulator initialization and protection

2016-04-11 Thread Pingbo Wen
(Resend, previous one rejected due to html link code) Hi, Those day, I get some fuzz idea in a proxy-consumer regulator driver [1] from Qcom kernel tree. The driver is simple, that let some critical regulator, which specified in DT tree, initializing in a pre-defined state, and hold a regulato