Re: [RFC] remove support for AVR32 architecture

2017-05-02 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 11:33 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt > wrote: >> Around Tue 02 May 2017 10:46:58 +0300 or thereabout, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt >>> wrote: Around

Re: [RFC] remove support for AVR32 architecture

2017-05-02 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote: > Around Tue 02 May 2017 10:46:58 +0300 or thereabout, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt >> wrote: >>> Around Mon 27 Mar 2017 15:35:56 +0200 or thereabout, Hans-Christian Nore

Re: [RFC] remove support for AVR32 architecture

2017-05-02 Thread Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt
Around Tue 02 May 2017 10:46:58 +0300 or thereabout, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt > wrote: >> Around Mon 27 Mar 2017 15:35:56 +0200 or thereabout, Hans-Christian Noren >> Egtvedt wrote: >>> Around Mon 27 Mar 2017 15:26:04 +0200 or thereabou

Re: [RFC] remove support for AVR32 architecture

2017-05-02 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote: > Around Mon 27 Mar 2017 15:35:56 +0200 or thereabout, Hans-Christian Noren > Egtvedt wrote: >> Around Mon 27 Mar 2017 15:26:04 +0200 or thereabout, Boris Brezillon wrote: >>> On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 21:44:26 +0100 Hans-Christian Nore

Re: [RFC] remove support for AVR32 architecture

2017-05-01 Thread Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt
Around Mon 27 Mar 2017 15:35:56 +0200 or thereabout, Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote: > Around Mon 27 Mar 2017 15:26:04 +0200 or thereabout, Boris Brezillon wrote: >> On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 21:44:26 +0100 Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt >> wrote: >> Is this still planned for 4.12? > > Yes, I hav

Re: [RFC] remove support for AVR32 architecture

2017-03-27 Thread Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt
Around Mon 27 Mar 2017 15:26:04 +0200 or thereabout, Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 21:44:26 +0100 Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt > wrote: >> The AVR32 architecture is not keeping up with the development of the kernel, >> and since it shares so much of the drivers with Atmel ARM SoC, i

Re: [RFC] remove support for AVR32 architecture

2017-03-27 Thread Boris Brezillon
Hi Hans, On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 21:44:26 +0100 Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote: > Hello all, > > The AVR32 architecture is not keeping up with the development of the kernel, > and since it shares so much of the drivers with Atmel ARM SoC, it is starting > to hinder these drivers to develop swift

Re: [RFC] remove support for AVR32 architecture

2017-03-06 Thread Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt
Around Sun 05 Mar 2017 21:58:16 -0800 or thereabout, Håvard Skinnemoen wrote: > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt > wrote: >> I have prepared three patches in my for-linus branch in git tree >> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/egtvedt/linux-avr32.git > > Ac

Re: [RFC] remove support for AVR32 architecture

2017-03-05 Thread Håvard Skinnemoen
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote: > I have prepared three patches in my for-linus branch in git tree > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/egtvedt/linux-avr32.git Acked-by: Haavard Skinnemoen Thank you for keeping it alive for so long! I looked throu

Re: [RFC] remove support for AVR32 architecture

2017-03-02 Thread Nicolas Ferre
Le 01/03/2017 à 21:44, Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt a écrit : > Hello all, > > The AVR32 architecture is not keeping up with the development of the kernel, > and since it shares so much of the drivers with Atmel ARM SoC, it is starting > to hinder these drivers to develop swiftly. It will definit

Re: [RFC] remove support for AVR32 architecture

2017-03-01 Thread Boris Brezillon
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 21:44:26 +0100 Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote: > Hello all, > > The AVR32 architecture is not keeping up with the development of the kernel, > and since it shares so much of the drivers with Atmel ARM SoC, it is starting > to hinder these drivers to develop swiftly. Thank

Re: [RFC] remove support for AVR32 architecture

2017-03-01 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 10:44 PM, Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote: > Hello all, > > The AVR32 architecture is not keeping up with the development of the kernel, > and since it shares so much of the drivers with Atmel ARM SoC, it is starting > to hinder these drivers to develop swiftly. > > Also,

[RFC] remove support for AVR32 architecture

2017-03-01 Thread Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt
Hello all, The AVR32 architecture is not keeping up with the development of the kernel, and since it shares so much of the drivers with Atmel ARM SoC, it is starting to hinder these drivers to develop swiftly. Also, all AVR32 AP7 SoC processors are end of lifed from Atmel (now Microchip). Finall