Re: [RFC] pinctrl: Provide a generic device tree binding for per-pin pin controllers

2014-11-18 Thread Sascha Hauer
Hi Stephen, On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:05:40PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 10/23/2014 07:23 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > Most iomux controllers allow a configuration per pin. These currently > > have no common device tree binding. There are many different SoC > > specific bindings for this cl

Re: [RFC] pinctrl: Provide a generic device tree binding for per-pin pin controllers

2014-10-29 Thread Stephen Warren
On 10/23/2014 07:23 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote: > Most iomux controllers allow a configuration per pin. These currently > have no common device tree binding. There are many different SoC > specific bindings for this class of iomux controllers. Some controllers > artificially group pins together where i

Re: [RFC] pinctrl: Provide a generic device tree binding for per-pin pin controllers

2014-10-28 Thread Linus Walleij
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote: > Most iomux controllers allow a configuration per pin. These currently > have no common device tree binding. There are many different SoC > specific bindings for this class of iomux controllers. Some controllers > artificially group pins toget

[RFC] pinctrl: Provide a generic device tree binding for per-pin pin controllers

2014-10-23 Thread Sascha Hauer
Most iomux controllers allow a configuration per pin. These currently have no common device tree binding. There are many different SoC specific bindings for this class of iomux controllers. Some controllers artificially group pins together where in hardware no groups exist (for example lantiq). Oth