On Saturday, January 27, 2007 8:19 am, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > There are also some "legacy io" binary sysfs files in these
> > directories for those platforms that support it (#ifdef
> > HAVE_PCI_LEGACY), and I'm guessing that there is some user for them
> > out there, otherwise they would not ha
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 01:00:44AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 09:14:06AM +0100, Martin Mares wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > > I recommend we just delete the pci_bus class. I don't think it serves
> > > any useful purpose. The bridge can be inferred frmo the sysfs hierarchy
> > >
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 11:58:05PM -0700, Grant Grundler wrote:
> Other per bus attributes might be address routing, VGA routing enabled,
> Fast-back-to-back enabled. PCI-X bridges and PCI-e bridges might also
> advertise data related to MMRBC and similar onboard buffer mgt behaviors.
>
> ISTR, IB
On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 16:22 -0800, Tim Pepper wrote:
> On 1/18/07, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hm, only ia64 enables that option. Matthew, do you care about those
> > files?
>
> Given the ia64 nature, unless benh was truly wanting to do something
> or ppc64, IBM's big NUMA boxes are
On 1/18/07, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hm, only ia64 enables that option. Matthew, do you care about those
files?
Given the ia64 nature, unless benh was truly wanting to do something
or ppc64, IBM's big NUMA boxes are pretty unlikely to care.
Tim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: sen
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 09:14:06AM +0100, Martin Mares wrote:
> Hello!
>
> > I recommend we just delete the pci_bus class. I don't think it serves
> > any useful purpose. The bridge can be inferred frmo the sysfs hierarchy
> > (not to mention lspci will tell you). The cpuaffinity file should be
Hello!
> So, if it were to stay, where in the tree should it be? Hanging off of
> the pci device that is the bridge? Or just placing these files within
> the pci device directory itself, as it is the bridge.
I originally didn't realize that we already represent devices on the
subordinate bus as
On Thursday, January 18, 2007 1:00 am, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 09:14:06AM +0100, Martin Mares wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > > I recommend we just delete the pci_bus class. I don't think it
> > > serves any useful purpose. The bridge can be inferred frmo the
> > > sysfs hierarchy (not
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 09:14:06AM +0100, Martin Mares wrote:
> Hello!
>
> > I recommend we just delete the pci_bus class. I don't think it serves
> > any useful purpose. The bridge can be inferred frmo the sysfs hierarchy
> > (not to mention lspci will tell you). The cpuaffinity file should be
Hello!
> I recommend we just delete the pci_bus class. I don't think it serves
> any useful purpose. The bridge can be inferred frmo the sysfs hierarchy
> (not to mention lspci will tell you). The cpuaffinity file should be
> moved from the bus to the device -- it really doesn't make any sense
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 07:23:52PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 04:53:45PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > I'm trying to clean up all the usages of struct class_device to use
> > struct device, and I ran into the pci_bus code. Right now you create a
> > symlink called "bridge"
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 04:53:45PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> I'm trying to clean up all the usages of struct class_device to use
> struct device, and I ran into the pci_bus code. Right now you create a
> symlink called "bridge" under the /sys/class/pci_bus/:XX/ directory
> to the pci device that
Hi Matt,
I'm trying to clean up all the usages of struct class_device to use
struct device, and I ran into the pci_bus code. Right now you create a
symlink called "bridge" under the /sys/class/pci_bus/:XX/ directory
to the pci device that is the bridge.
This is messy to try to convert to str
13 matches
Mail list logo
