Re: [RFC] memcg/cgroup: do not fail fail on pre_destroy callbacks

2012-10-17 Thread Kamezawa Hiroyuki
(2012/10/17 22:30), Michal Hocko wrote: > Hi, > memcg is the only controller which might fail in its pre_destroy > callback which makes the cgroup core more complicated for no good > reason. This is an attempt to change this unfortunate state. > > I am sending this a RFC because I would like to he

Re: [RFC] memcg/cgroup: do not fail fail on pre_destroy callbacks

2012-10-17 Thread Glauber Costa
On 10/17/2012 05:30 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > Hi, > memcg is the only controller which might fail in its pre_destroy > callback which makes the cgroup core more complicated for no good > reason. This is an attempt to change this unfortunate state. > > I am sending this a RFC because I would like

[RFC] memcg/cgroup: do not fail fail on pre_destroy callbacks

2012-10-17 Thread Michal Hocko
Hi, memcg is the only controller which might fail in its pre_destroy callback which makes the cgroup core more complicated for no good reason. This is an attempt to change this unfortunate state. I am sending this a RFC because I would like to hear back whether the approach is correct. I thought