Hi,
Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> [ Alternatively, we could make a per-cpu mapping area or something. Not
>> that it's probably worth it, but if we wanted to avoid all locking and
>> instead just disable preemption, that would be the way to go. --Linus ]
>>
>> T
On Mon, 2006-12-25 at 02:05 +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [ Alternatively, we could make a per-cpu mapping area or something. Not
> that it's probably worth it, but if we wanted to avoid all locking and
> instead just disable preemption, that would be the way to go. --Linu
Hi,
[ Alternatively, we could make a per-cpu mapping area or something. Not
that it's probably worth it, but if we wanted to avoid all locking and
instead just disable preemption, that would be the way to go. --Linus ]
This patch is a draft of Linus's suggestion. This seems work f
3 matches
Mail list logo