On 02/16/2016 01:02 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 15:05 +0530, Archit Taneja wrote:
component_master_add_with_match can fail if the master's bind op doesn't
go through successfully. In such a scenario, all the components in the
master's match array have their 'master' poi
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 07:32:02PM +, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> It seems to me that for other error cases (that don't result in deletion
> of objects) we would want to leave the references between components and
> masters intact once they have been created.
Indeed we do - because we want to
On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 15:05 +0530, Archit Taneja wrote:
> component_master_add_with_match can fail if the master's bind op doesn't
> go through successfully. In such a scenario, all the components in the
> master's match array have their 'master' pointer set to the given master.
> These pointers ne
Hi Archit,
On 11 February 2016 at 09:35, Archit Taneja wrote:
> component_master_add_with_match can fail if the master's bind op doesn't
> go through successfully. In such a scenario, all the components in the
> master's match array have their 'master' pointer set to the given master.
> These poi
component_master_add_with_match can fail if the master's bind op doesn't
go through successfully. In such a scenario, all the components in the
master's match array have their 'master' pointer set to the given master.
These pointers need to be set to NULL again. If they aren't, successive
calls to
5 matches
Mail list logo
