Re: [RFC] USB phy type C

On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:27:28AM -0800, David Cohen wrote: > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 12:45:53PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:41:37AM -0800, David Cohen wrote: > > > Hi Felipe, et al, > > > > > > Is there any on going discussion regarding to USB phy for t

Re: [RFC] USB phy type C

On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 12:45:53PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:41:37AM -0800, David Cohen wrote: > > Hi Felipe, et al, > > > > Is there any on going discussion regarding to USB phy for type C connectors? > > > > We'd like to know the community's preferable dir

Re: [RFC] USB phy type C

Hi, On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:41:37AM -0800, David Cohen wrote: > Hi Felipe, et al, > > Is there any on going discussion regarding to USB phy for type C connectors? > > We'd like to know the community's preferable direction for handling > (still unsupported) cases like USB3.1 PD, Accessories an

[RFC] USB phy type C

Hi Felipe, et al, Is there any on going discussion regarding to USB phy for type C connectors? We'd like to know the community's preferable direction for handling (still unsupported) cases like USB3.1 PD, Accessories and Alternate modes as a new layer or an extension of current USB phy layer. Co