On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 12:27:49AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Al Viro wrote:
>
> > It's too early for AFD postings. And you *are* tempting
> > me to throw into the tree as many anti-C++ devices as can be
> > done tastefully, just to stop somebody attempting that insanity
> > in the earnes
Al Viro wrote:
> It's too early for AFD postings. And you *are* tempting
> me to throw into the tree as many anti-C++ devices as can be
> done tastefully, just to stop somebody attempting that insanity
> in the earnest.
You would deliberately break the UAPI header files to make sure that
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 01:01:24AM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > Don't tempt me...
>
> <= g++-8 doesn't support C99 style initializers.
> g++-8 mostly does: for example
>
> .foo = {
> [BAR] = 1,
> },
>
> doesn't work, but regular .foo = 42 does.
> Additionally, g++
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 11:22:47PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 10:31:11PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 09:26:36PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 09:59:22PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 04:54:27P
Here's a set of patches that inserts a step into the build process to make
sure that the UAPI headers can all be built together with C++ (if the
compiler being used supports C++).
Note that it's based on a commit from the sound tree to fix usage of u32
and co..
Most of the patches perform fixup
Le mercredi 05 septembre 2018 à 19:33 +0200, Yann Droneaud a écrit :
> Le mercredi 05 septembre 2018 à 18:55 +0200, Greg KH a écrit :
> > On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 04:54:27PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> > >
> > > Here's a set of patches that inserts a step into the build
> > > process to make
> >
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 10:31:11PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 09:26:36PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 09:59:22PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 04:54:27PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Here's a set o
Greg KH wrote:
> "struct class" is going to be a hard one to overcome :)
Already done:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/1/126
David
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 09:26:36PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 09:59:22PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 04:54:27PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Here's a set of patches that inserts a step into the build process to
> > > > make
> > >
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 09:59:22PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 04:54:27PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> > >
> > > Here's a set of patches that inserts a step into the build process to make
> > > sure that the UAPI headers can all be built together with C++ (if the
> >
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 04:54:27PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> >
> > Here's a set of patches that inserts a step into the build process to make
> > sure that the UAPI headers can all be built together with C++ (if the
> > compiler being used supports C++). All but the final patch perform fixu
Hi,
Le mercredi 05 septembre 2018 à 18:55 +0200, Greg KH a écrit :
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 04:54:27PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> >
> > Here's a set of patches that inserts a step into the build process to make
> > sure that the UAPI headers can all be built together with C++ (if the
> > comp
12 matches
Mail list logo
