Kent Overstreet wrote:
The trouble is it's completely impractical with current tools; we need
tighter integration between md and LVM. Basically, we need a new type
of VG; you'd only be able to make it out of PVs that are the same size
(or close). Then, when you create an LV you decide what kind o
"Kent Overstreet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Basically, the order we want is fs -> raid -> lvm. Given a set of
> identical drives, we want LVM to handle them separately and divide
> them up into LVs identically; then corresponding LVs are raided
> together. We might have a raid5 volume and a
I believe I have the right way of going about it. I agree with the
kernel developers who've stated that ZFS is a layering violation, and
we can do better.
Consider a filesystem on a set of drives; it may want some data to be
in a raid5 and some to be mirrored. The correct interface for the
filesy
3 matches
Mail list logo
