Hi Laszlo,
On Wed Jan 22 13:25, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>
> Was there any progress done? I saw the following thread, too, so
> including CC in the loop:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg13141.html
>
I have patches that adds a "eeprom_dev" class that I described in the
above thread. The p
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 07:08:28PM +0100, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
>> [plaintext and fixed address of David Brownell]
>
> David passed away a year or so ago, so that's really not going to help :(
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Several of the eeprom drivers that live in drivers/misc/eeprom export
>> a binar
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 08:25:59AM +0100, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 07:08:28PM +0100, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
> >> [plaintext and fixed address of David Brownell]
> >
> > David passed away a year or so ago,
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 07:08:28PM +0100, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
>> [plaintext and fixed address of David Brownell]
>
> David passed away a year or so ago, so that's really not going to help :(
So sorry to hear that, I was not aware...
>
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 07:08:28PM +0100, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
> [plaintext and fixed address of David Brownell]
David passed away a year or so ago, so that's really not going to help :(
> Hi,
>
> Several of the eeprom drivers that live in drivers/misc/eeprom export
> a binary sysfs fi
5 matches
Mail list logo