Jan Kara wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:22:03 -0800
Suzuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 17:58:12 -0800
Suzuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Fix the kmalloc flags used from within ext3, when we have an active journal
handle
If we do a kmalloc
> On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:22:03 -0800
> Suzuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 17:58:12 -0800
> > > Suzuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>* Fix the kmalloc flags used from within ext3, when we have an active
> > >>journal handle
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:22:03 -0800
Suzuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 17:58:12 -0800
> > Suzuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>* Fix the kmalloc flags used from within ext3, when we have an active
> >>journal handle
> >>
> >>If we do
Hi,
> The attached patch converts the GFP mask for kmallocs within ext3 to
> GFP_NOFS whenever they are called with an active journal handle.
>
> * Fix the kmalloc flags used from within ext3, when we have an active journal
> handle
>
> If we do a kmalloc with GFP_KERNEL on system run
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 17:58:12 -0800
Suzuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Fix the kmalloc flags used from within ext3, when we have an active journal
handle
If we do a kmalloc with GFP_KERNEL on system running low on memory,
with an active journal handle, we might
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 17:58:12 -0800
Suzuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Fix the kmalloc flags used from within ext3, when we have an active journal
> handle
>
> If we do a kmalloc with GFP_KERNEL on system running low on memory,
> with an active journal handle, we might end up in cleanin
Hi,
The attached patch converts the GFP mask for kmallocs within ext3 to
GFP_NOFS whenever they are called with an active journal handle.
More description in the patch.
Comments ?
Thanks,
Suzuki
Linux Technology Center
IBM Systems & Technology Labs.
* Fix the kmalloc flags used from within
7 matches
Mail list logo