Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/6] sparsemem: more separation between NUMA and DISCONTIG

On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 15:08 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > There is some confusion with the SPARSEMEM patch between what > > is needed for DISCONTIG vs. NUMA. For instance, the NODE_DATA() > > macro needs to be switched on NUMA, but not on FLATMEM.

Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/6] sparsemem: more separation between NUMA and DISCONTIG

Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There is some confusion with the SPARSEMEM patch between what > is needed for DISCONTIG vs. NUMA. For instance, the NODE_DATA() > macro needs to be switched on NUMA, but not on FLATMEM. > > This patch is required if the previous patch is applied. Th

[RFC][PATCH 5/6] sparsemem: more separation between NUMA and DISCONTIG

There is some confusion with the SPARSEMEM patch between what is needed for DISCONTIG vs. NUMA. For instance, the NODE_DATA() macro needs to be switched on NUMA, but not on FLATMEM. This patch is required if the previous patch is applied. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- mem