On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 04:27:50PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 00:02:07 -1000
> Joey Pabalinas wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 08:27:16PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > The static inline function task_curr_ret_stack() is unused, remove it.
> >
> > Just want ot m
On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 00:02:07 -1000
Joey Pabalinas wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 08:27:16PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > The static inline function task_curr_ret_stack() is unused, remove it.
>
> Just want ot make sure I understand this correctly, instead of using this
> function, the co
On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 16:40:02 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 20:27:16 -0500
> Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)"
> >
> > The static inline function task_curr_ret_stack() is unused, remove it.
>
> This looks able to be applied without this series
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 08:27:16PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> The static inline function task_curr_ret_stack() is unused, remove it.
Just want ot make sure I understand this correctly, instead of using this
function, the convention now is to just directly assign `t->curr_ret_stack =
-1`?
--
On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 20:27:16 -0500
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)"
>
> The static inline function task_curr_ret_stack() is unused, remove it.
This looks able to be applied without this series. I think we should
apply this to for-next branch?
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramat
From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)"
The static inline function task_curr_ret_stack() is unused, remove it.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware)
---
include/linux/ftrace.h | 10 --
1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/ftrace.h b/include/linux/ftrace.h
index 477ff941
6 matches
Mail list logo