Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: SCHED_FIFO watchdog timer

2007-10-15 Thread Kay Sievers
On 10/14/07, Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The below patch is an idea proposed by tglx and depends on sched-devel + > the hrtick patch previously posted. > > The current watchdog action is to demote the task to SCHED_NORMAL, > however it might be wanted to deliver a signal instead (or

Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: SCHED_FIFO watchdog timer

2007-10-15 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sun, 14.10.07 00:51, Peter Zijlstra ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > The below patch is an idea proposed by tglx and depends on sched-devel + > the hrtick patch previously posted. > > The current watchdog action is to demote the task to SCHED_NORMAL, > however it might be wanted to deliver a signa

Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: SCHED_FIFO watchdog timer

2007-10-15 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 15:26 +0200, Dmitry Adamushko wrote: > On 14/10/2007, Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The below patch is an idea proposed by tglx and depends on sched-devel + > > the hrtick patch previously posted. > > > > The current watchdog action is to demote the task to SCH

Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: SCHED_FIFO watchdog timer

2007-10-15 Thread Dmitry Adamushko
On 14/10/2007, Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The below patch is an idea proposed by tglx and depends on sched-devel + > the hrtick patch previously posted. > > The current watchdog action is to demote the task to SCHED_NORMAL, > however it might be wanted to deliver a signal instead (

[RFC][PATCH] sched: SCHED_FIFO watchdog timer

2007-10-13 Thread Peter Zijlstra
The below patch is an idea proposed by tglx and depends on sched-devel + the hrtick patch previously posted. The current watchdog action is to demote the task to SCHED_NORMAL, however it might be wanted to deliver a signal instead (or have more per task configuration state). Which is why I added L