Manfred Spraul writes:
> On 03/14/2018 08:49 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> To make it possible to keep checkpoint/restore working I have renamed
>> the sysctls from xxx_next_id to xxx_nextid. That is enough change that
>> a smart CRIU implementation can see that what is exporte
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 08:07:44PM +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> Hello Mathew,
>
> On 03/29/2018 12:56 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 10:47:45AM +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> > > > > > > > This can be implemented trivially with the current code
> > > > > > > > using idr_al
Manfred Spraul writes:
> Hello Mathew,
>
> On 03/29/2018 12:56 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 10:47:45AM +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
This can be implemented trivially with the current code
using idr_alloc_cyclic.
>>> Is there a performance impact?
>>> Righ
Hello Mathew,
On 03/29/2018 12:56 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 10:47:45AM +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
This can be implemented trivially with the current code
using idr_alloc_cyclic.
Is there a performance impact?
Right now, the idr tree is only large if there are lots of
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 10:47:45AM +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> > > > > > This can be implemented trivially with the current code
> > > > > > using idr_alloc_cyclic.
>
> Is there a performance impact?
> Right now, the idr tree is only large if there are lots of objects.
> What happens if we have
Hello together,
On 03/29/2018 04:14 AM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
Cc'ing mtk, Manfred and linux-api.
See below.
On Thu, 15 Mar 2018, Waiman Long wrote:
On 03/15/2018 03:00 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Waiman Long writes:
On 03/14/2018 08:49 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
The define IPCMNI was
Cc'ing mtk, Manfred and linux-api.
See below.
On Thu, 15 Mar 2018, Waiman Long wrote:
On 03/15/2018 03:00 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Waiman Long writes:
On 03/14/2018 08:49 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
The define IPCMNI was originally the size of a statically sized array in
the kernel a
On 03/15/2018 03:00 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Waiman Long writes:
>
>> On 03/14/2018 08:49 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>> The define IPCMNI was originally the size of a statically sized array in
>>> the kernel and that has long since been removed. Therefore there is no
>>> fundamental reas
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 07:49:29PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> @@ -109,20 +109,13 @@ void free_ipcs(struct ipc_namespace *ns, struct ipc_ids
> *ids,
> {
> struct kern_ipc_perm *perm;
> int next_id;
> - int total, in_use;
>
> down_write(&ids->rwsem);
> -
> - in_us
Waiman Long writes:
> On 03/14/2018 08:49 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> The define IPCMNI was originally the size of a statically sized array in
>> the kernel and that has long since been removed. Therefore there is no
>> fundamental reason for IPCMNI.
>>
>> The only remaining use IPCMNI serve
On 03/14/2018 08:49 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> The define IPCMNI was originally the size of a statically sized array in
> the kernel and that has long since been removed. Therefore there is no
> fundamental reason for IPCMNI.
>
> The only remaining use IPCMNI serves is as a convoluted way to f
The define IPCMNI was originally the size of a statically sized array in
the kernel and that has long since been removed. Therefore there is no
fundamental reason for IPCMNI.
The only remaining use IPCMNI serves is as a convoluted way to format
the ipc id to userspace. It does not appear that a
12 matches
Mail list logo
