On 11/26/2018 6:42 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
On 11/26/18 6:56 AM, Roberto Sassu wrote:
On 11/23/2018 9:21 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
The aim of this patch is to provide the same functionality without
introducing a new format. The value of xattrs is placed in regular files
having the same file name as
On 11/26/18 6:56 AM, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> On 11/23/2018 9:21 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
>>> The aim of this patch is to provide the same functionality without
>>> introducing a new format. The value of xattrs is placed in regular files
>>> having the same file name as the files xattrs are added to, p
On 11/26/2018 4:56 AM, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> On 11/23/2018 9:21 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
>> On 11/22/18 9:49 AM, Roberto Sassu wrote:
>>> Although rootfs (tmpfs) supports xattrs, they are not set due to the
>>> limitation of the cpio format. A new format called 'newcx' was proposed to
>>> overcome t
On 11/26/2018 4:51 AM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-11-23 at 18:07 -0800, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>> On 11/23/2018 11:30 AM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2018-11-23 at 11:03 -0800, Casey Schaufler wrote:
On 11/22/2018 7:49 AM, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> Although rootfs (tmpfs) supports xat
On 11/23/2018 9:21 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
On 11/22/18 9:49 AM, Roberto Sassu wrote:
Although rootfs (tmpfs) supports xattrs, they are not set due to the
limitation of the cpio format. A new format called 'newcx' was proposed to
overcome this limitation.
I got email about that format the day be
On Fri, 2018-11-23 at 18:07 -0800, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 11/23/2018 11:30 AM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > On Fri, 2018-11-23 at 11:03 -0800, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> >> On 11/22/2018 7:49 AM, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> >>> Although rootfs (tmpfs) supports xattrs, they are not set due to the
> >>> limit
On 11/23/2018 11:30 AM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-11-23 at 11:03 -0800, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>> On 11/22/2018 7:49 AM, Roberto Sassu wrote:
>>> Although rootfs (tmpfs) supports xattrs, they are not set due to the
>>> limitation of the cpio format. A new format called 'newcx' was proposed t
On 11/22/18 9:49 AM, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> Although rootfs (tmpfs) supports xattrs, they are not set due to the
> limitation of the cpio format. A new format called 'newcx' was proposed to
> overcome this limitation.
I got email about that format the day before you posted this, by the way.
> How
On Fri, 2018-11-23 at 11:03 -0800, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 11/22/2018 7:49 AM, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > Although rootfs (tmpfs) supports xattrs, they are not set due to the
> > limitation of the cpio format. A new format called 'newcx' was proposed to
> > overcome this limitation.
> >
> > Howev
On 11/22/2018 7:49 AM, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> Although rootfs (tmpfs) supports xattrs, they are not set due to the
> limitation of the cpio format. A new format called 'newcx' was proposed to
> overcome this limitation.
>
> However, it looks like that adding a new format is not simple: 15 kernel
>
Although rootfs (tmpfs) supports xattrs, they are not set due to the
limitation of the cpio format. A new format called 'newcx' was proposed to
overcome this limitation.
However, it looks like that adding a new format is not simple: 15 kernel
patches; user space tools must support the new format;
11 matches
Mail list logo