On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 04:04:54PM +0100, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> [Please keep me on CC, as I'm not on LKML.]
> I've recently got a Sun Blade 1000 box with a QLA2200 controller, and
> I'm bumping into exact same problem with 2.6.22:
Please try
http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=118289275414202
which
[Please keep me on CC, as I'm not on LKML.]
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 04:00:57PM -0400, James Smart wrote:
> I doubt it's in the fc transport - it's doing what it always did, which has
> nothing to do with coherency of the sdev's.
>
> We're seeing like problems, and it looks like it's related to the
I doubt it's in the fc transport - it's doing what it always did, which has
nothing to do with coherency of the sdev's.
We're seeing like problems, and it looks like it's related to the scan_mutex
being held when some of the entry points are being called via the recent
async scan code (which also
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 14:13 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> Ok I have a new patch that I've built and tested on both my UP and SMP machine
> and it appears to work fine. I took the async check out of scsi_add_lun, I
> don't really see the point in waiting to do the sysfs registration stuff (if
> there
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 09:59:56AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 12:23:45AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:06:56 -0400 Josef Bacik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 10:02:36AM -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 200
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 12:23:45AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:06:56 -0400 Josef Bacik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 10:02:36AM -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 09:25 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > > > Looking through ever
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:06:56 -0400 Josef Bacik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 10:02:36AM -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 09:25 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > > Looking through everything I came to the conclusion that we don't really
> > > need
> > > th
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 10:02:36AM -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 09:25 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > Looking through everything I came to the conclusion that we don't really
> > need
> > the scsi_sysfs_add_devices in scsi_finish_async_scan, which gets run
> > everytime
> >
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 09:25 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> Looking through everything I came to the conclusion that we don't really need
> the scsi_sysfs_add_devices in scsi_finish_async_scan, which gets run everytime
> we do a do_scan_async. In doing the scanning, if we come upon anything we
> will
Hello,
Resending this to a wider audience (thanks Andrew). I'm having a problem on
the newest version of linus's git tree with my qla2xxx card. This is on a UP
box, the problem doesn't happen on my similarly configured SMP box. When I
unload and then try to load the qla2xxx driver again I ge
Hello,
I'm having a problem on the newest version of linus's git tree with my qla2xxx
card. This is on a UP box, the problem doesn't happen on my similarly
configured SMP box. When I unload and then try to load the qla2xxx driver again
I get this message
kobject_add failed for 3:0:0:0 with -EEX
11 matches
Mail list logo
