On 2015-08-04 07:46:50, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Tyler,
>
> Am 04.08.2015 um 01:07 schrieb Tyler Hicks:
> >> Okay, then I'd argument to give my patch a try although it is not the
> >> solution
> >> to the problem I've reported. :-)
> >> If you don't mind I'll resend with a proper changelog.
>
Tyler,
Am 04.08.2015 um 01:07 schrieb Tyler Hicks:
>> Okay, then I'd argument to give my patch a try although it is not the
>> solution
>> to the problem I've reported. :-)
>> If you don't mind I'll resend with a proper changelog.
>
> That patch isn't correct since it assumes that all eCryptfs s
On 2015-08-03 20:31:57, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Tyler,
>
> Am 03.08.2015 um 07:27 schrieb Tyler Hicks:
> >> So ecryptfs definitely supports mounting the same lower path multiple
> >> times?
> >> What is the benefit of that behavior?
> >
> > No, it doesn't support that in a way that provides
Tyler,
Am 03.08.2015 um 07:27 schrieb Tyler Hicks:
>> So ecryptfs definitely supports mounting the same lower path multiple times?
>> What is the benefit of that behavior?
>
> No, it doesn't support that in a way that provides consistency among all
> of the eCryptfs mounts.
Okay, then I'd argume
On 2015-08-02 09:51:16, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 02.08.2015 um 03:03 schrieb Tyler Hicks:
> > Thanks for the report and for the patch, Richard!
> >
> > On 2015-07-31 12:23:10, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> Mounting the same lower path multiple times should not result
> >> into multiple ecry
Am 02.08.2015 um 03:03 schrieb Tyler Hicks:
> Thanks for the report and for the patch, Richard!
>
> On 2015-07-31 12:23:10, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Mounting the same lower path multiple times should not result
>> into multiple ecryptfs instances, otherwise ecryptfs gets confused.
>>
>> A comm
Thanks for the report and for the patch, Richard!
On 2015-07-31 12:23:10, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Mounting the same lower path multiple times should not result
> into multiple ecryptfs instances, otherwise ecryptfs gets confused.
>
> A command sequence of:
An important detail that took me a
Mounting the same lower path multiple times should not result
into multiple ecryptfs instances, otherwise ecryptfs gets confused.
A command sequence of:
$ mount -t ecryptfs /tmp/.secret /mnt_a/secret/
$ mount -t ecryptfs /tmp/.secret /mnt_b/secret/
$ mkdir -p /mnt_a/secret/xxx
$ mkdir -p /mnt_b/s
8 matches
Mail list logo